The book of Numbers matches the second half of Isaiah chapter 3 and Isaiah chapter 4. Numbers sits in slot 4 of the book order. The focus is on Miriam and the second census.
This is one of a number of places in Isaiah where the chapter break and the book break do not align. The reason for shifting Numbers back into Isaiah 3 is simply because there's no content in Leviticus that matches the theme in the second half of Isaiah 3, but the story of Miriam in the book of Numbers matches the theme just fine.
One effect of pushing Numbers back into the second half of Isaiah 3 is Numbers ends up with twice as much column space as Leviticus. One explanation for this is the way Leviticus has very little narrative. It's almost entirely a style of writting called "law." Numbers on the other hand is mostly narrative with law scattered in at places. For whatever reason Isaiah is commentating on story, not law.
One last consideration for why Numbers would back up into Leviticus comes from looking at the overall flow of things. Leviticus matches into Isaiah on the story of Aaron's ordination. Numbers begins matching into Isaiah on the story of Miriam's leprousy. There are 28 chapters between the two stories that Isaiah skips to make a deliberate linkage between the two stories. It appears that Isaiah does this because it wants us to compare the stories.
Aaron was ordained through a 7 day process that involved isolation in the tent. Afterwards God showed up in power. In Miriam's case the reverse happens. After bad mouthing Moses she is called to the tent where God shows in power. When he lifts she is found leprous and is isolated outside the camp for 7 days. Same story. Aaron's ordination is a type of promotion and carries a sense of honor. Miriam's story is a type of demotion (when she was trying to promote herself) and it is a disgrace.
To see a theme develop between where Isaiah leaves off matching in Leviticus and where he begins matching in Numbers is yet another piece of evidence that it is right to push Numbers back into Isaiah chapter 3 and that Leviticus is followed by Numbers in the book order.
Two specific details in this quote from Isaiah 3 match what was happening in the story with Miriam in Numbers.
| Isaiah | Numbers |
|---|---|
|
13 Isaiah 3:12 |
4 Numbers 12:1-2 |
The first detail is that the leaders are making the people err. In Numbers it was Aaron and Miriam who spoke wrongly about Moses. What we don't know from Numbers is that they spoke this way to the community in general and not just other leaders. Isaiah says the leaders led the people astray, not other leaders astray. It's also interesting to note from the Isaiah passage that God is apparently so pissed that he's talking to the community about what the leaders did wrong. This is profound, he's not talking to Aaron and Miriam, he's not telling the leaders that "you" did wrong. He's going behind their backs, like they did to Moses, and he's telling everyone else they blew it. He's restoring Moses' dignity. If Aaron and Miriam told you one thing about Moses and God another who would you believe? I'd go with what God says.
The second detail in this match is the way it specifies women ruling the people. Something was going on with Miriam that caused her to break out with leprousy where Aaron did not. Though Aaron was in the wrong, it is clear that Miriam was severly wrong in her attempt to elevate her role as a leader. Women will rule, or at least attempt to rule, over the people, and in so doing lead them astray. I don't think this means women can never lead, Isaiah is just dealing with what was happening in this story, which is a woman going about trying to lead in the wrong way and having an adverse effect on the community as a result. Similar stories occur later in Numbers and involve men trying to usurp, but with worse consequences (see Numbers 16).
When Yahvah hears what Miriam had been saying about Moses and his wife he comes to the rescue and takes Aaron and Miriam to task.
| Isaiah | Numbers |
|---|---|
|
13 Isaiah 3:13-15 |
4 Numbers 12:3-9 |
There are several correlations in this match. First, Yahvah comes to judge the "elders" of the people. Isaiah is treating Aaron and Miriam as elders, or leaders, which we've already seen.
The second correlation is the question that occurs in both passages. In Isaiah the question is "Why did you shame the face of the poor?" The word for "poor" () here in Isaiah shares a two-letter root with the word "meek" () used to describe Moses in Numbers 12:3. So the question, "Why did you shame the poor?", can be treated as, "Why did you shame Moses?". It's a direct match. God asks the same question in the Numbers passage, "Why were you not afraid to speak against my servant Moses?"
The answer to why Miriam was not araid to speak against Moses in an attempt to elevate her leadership in the community apparently is an effect of the sins of the community. Stated another way, she's feeling political pressure to make a name for herself as a woman. Read on and see what you think.
| Isaiah | Numbers |
|---|---|
|
13 Isaiah 3:16-25
|
4 Numbers 12:10-13 |
Because the women of Zion are a certain way, Miriam attempts to rise in leadership. Wrong reason. Since the women of Zion effect someone like Miriam this way Yahvah turns around and deals with them and eventually stips them. Miriam on the other hand is made leprous for a time. These are a match in the sense that being unclothed reveals what's underneath and the leprousy on Miriam revealed something about her heart, something on the inside. This match also keys us into a gender dynamic in play that we don't otherwise see in this Israelite/Egyptian population.
Isaiah commits a lot of column space to describing the women of Zion. I think there's a mistake in how the grammar is parsed. It looks to me like Isaiah 3:15 should have a comma followed by a period after verse 16. And verse 17 should begin a new sentence and thought. This is a different parse then I've seen, but it makes sense of the context in Isaiah and agrees with the parallel matches going by in the book of Numbers.
The last thought in the Isaiah passage about the mighty men dying in battle seems out of place. Perhaps there's a translational issue here, but otherwise it may be the end result of this feminizing of leadership issue that is being addressed. Men suddenly cannot do what men sometimes have to do, like win against men from another country in a war. Curious thought. What do you think?
The time frame for Miriam's leprousy and isolation outside the camp was 7 days according to Numbers. In Isaiah there are 7 women who have an issue with "disgrace."
| Isaiah | Numbers |
|---|---|
|
13 Isaiah 4:1 |
4 Numbers 12:14-15 |
There's a principle in Scripture that whenever the Holy Spirit gives a count of something, whatever else it may be, it's a count of time. Joseph establishes this principle when he interprets the dreams given by the Holy Spirit to the baker and cupbearer (see Genesis 40). In this match we have 7 days and 7 women. The count of 7 women is a match to the 7 days of Miriam's (a woman) isolation outside the camp. The issue for the 7 women is their "disgrace." The words about Miriam in Numbers is that she is spending 7 days of "shame" outside the camp. So these passages match on the count and subject.
These women in Isaiah are apparently unclothed. These are, after all, the women of Zion that Yahvah just stripped at the end of Isaiah chapter 3. Now they need covering, whether clothes or a man, to remove their disgrace. In the Numbers account Miriam needs to come back into the camp, under the right leadership, to remove her shame.
Now the focus shifts to the story of spying out the promised land.
| Isaiah | Numbers |
|---|---|
|
13 Isaiah 4:2 |
4 Numbers 13:23-24 |
Isaiah talks about the "fruit of the land." In Numbers the story that follows Miriam's is the story of spying out the land, and one of the key details in that story is the branch of grapes the spies brought back to the camp to show how good the fruit of the land was. In fact, the fruit of the land was so good it took two men to carry one bunch of grapes. Isaiah says the fruit of the land will be enjoyed by the "remnant." The remnant will turn out to be the children that do not die in the desert over the next 38 years. It's to the remnant that we go next.
There are two correlations in this match. See if you can spot them.
| Isaiah | Numbers |
|---|---|
|
13 Isaiah 4:3 |
4 Numbers 26:1-4 |
The first correlation is that we're dealing with "survivors." The ones that survived the 38 years in the wilderness to be counted in the second generation census are the children (19 and younger) of the adults who left Egypt. They are survivors because for 38 years everyone has been dying while wandering around the wilderness.
The second correlation is that these survivors are going to be "written" down. The census was most surely written down. We have the tribal counts to this day, written in the book of Numbers.
In Numbers the story following the second census is the daughters of Zelophehad coming to Moses to ask about inheritance rights in the law.
| Isaiah | Numbers |
|---|---|
|
13 Isaiah 4:4 |
4 Numbers 27:1-4 |
The testimony of these women is that their father died in the wilderness for his sins. Isaiah is dealing with how God "purged" (past tense) the filfth of the women of Zion. This is interesting because it suggests the women of Zion stuff earlier has some application to the whole generation of people that died in the wilderness, such as Zelophehad, the father of these women. It also suggests that these women are not like the women of Zion, for they are rightly submitted to Moses and the law and have survived the "purging."
The next story in Numbers is the schedule for daily offerings that the priests were to make. In Isaiah a picture is painted of a cloud and smoke and fire that provides a covering.
| Isaiah | Numbers |
|---|---|
|
13 Isaiah 4:5-5:0 |
4 Numbers 28:1-8 |
There are several correlations in this match. First the fire and smoke that provides "covering" mentioned in Isaiah is the same fire and smoke of the daily burnt offerings scheduled in Numbers. A burnt offering clearly is a fire and puts off smoke and provides a covering for the sins of the community. This correlation has three details.
The second correlation in this general match is the time. Isaiah says there will be a cloud by day and a fire by night. In Numbers the schedule for the daily offerings involves a morning and evening sacrifice. So the morning sacrifice would burn in the daylight, making a cloud of smoke, and the evening sacrifice would burn in the dark, where the fire becomes the most visible sign.
People often want to link this reference with the pillar of fire and cloud that Israel followed in the wilderness, and that's not necessarily wrong, it's probably related in fact, but the way the second half of Isaiah chapter 3 and Isaiah chapter 4 match stories in Numbers, one after another, this fire and smoke reference in Isaiah is best explained as a description of the normal activity of the daily burnt offering performed by the priests. This does make me think, though, that the way God manifested as a pillar of fire by night and a cloud (of smoke?) by day was prefiguring the daily sacrifice that he eventually established in Israel.