| / home / isaiah / 41_matthew |
Isaiah 41 maps into the first four chapters of the Gospel of Matthew. The matches begin with Abraham and cover stories like the temptation of Jesus.
Matthew begins with mention of Abraham right of the bat. Jesus is shown to be descended from Abraham. The key is realizing the "righteous" one from the east is Abraham.
|
13 Isaiah 41:2-4 |
41 Matthew 1:1 |
Note the way the Isaiah quote ends. The wording is interesting. It suggests not only that Yahvah is in control of the generations from beginning to end, but he is the guy mentioned at the end of the genealogy. Jesus.
The Isaiah quote has some pieces here that I don't know how to map to Matthew. My guess is there's a story in the names in the genealogy. When we get the names translated we can see if the resulting narrative matches any of this quote.
|
13 Isaiah 41:5-9
|
41 Matthew 1:17 |
That said, we are back to Abraham, whose mentioned again at the end of his genealogy. The Isaiah passage also mentions the sons of Abraham, whic his all the guys in the genealogy. This is why it's reasonable to think Matthew's list of names correspond to this passage in Isaiah even if we can't see how yet. Given the way the nearby verses in Isaiah match tightly into Matthew these few verses must go here.
The Isaiah passage goes on to say that God is with us. This is the name given Jesus at his birth, in fulfillment of prophecy, as mentioned in this passage of Matthew.
|
13 Isaiah 41:10 |
41 Matthew 1:22-23 |
Isaiah says those who strive against you will perish. Matthew's next story is Herod trying to kill Jesus and Joseph being warned in a dream to flee to Egypt.
|
13 Isaiah 41:11-14
|
41 Matthew 2:13-15 |
Eventually Joseph returns with his family to find Herod has perished. The sense here is that Herod did not just die of natural means or old age. The sense is God has made sure this evil guy is out of the way. Isaiah does not say how, but just that God was on the job. Though somewhat unrelated, the other Herod, in Acts 12, was also taken out by God, suggesting there's a Scriptural pattern that goes along with this name.
The next story in Matthew is John's speech towards the religious leaders from Jerusalem. He references winnowing, the same theme that happens next in Isaiah 41.
|
13 Isaiah 41:15-16 |
41 Matthew 3:11-12 |
Each of these matches can be pondered to a depth that I find quite profound. This match is interesting because Jesus is the one John says will do the winnowing, but he's saying as much to the religious leaders, which suggests Jesus is going to do this winnowing to the religious leaders. Isaiah does not identify his subject directly, but given the parallel we know it's Jesus. So aligning passages like this actually answers other questions like who the prophet is speaking to or about and who is going to do the winnowing.
The next story in Matthew is Jesus' 40 day fast in the wilderness. After not eating he becomes hungry, which is the theme that comes up next in Isaiah 41.
|
13 Isaiah 41:17-20 |
41 Matthew 4:1-2 41 Matthew 4:11 |
Not only is the theme of hunger shared by these passages, but the theme of being in the wilderness. Isaiah also focuses on how God will supply water in the dry places and how he will plant trees. This may relate somehow to the angels who served Jesus after his 40 day fast. Perhaps water issued from rocks like at the Exodus. If so, this makes Jesus a tree, of sorts, but that's not a new idea, he's the branch of Jesse.
The tempter draws near with his "counsels," but Jesus does not buy.
|
13 Isaiah 41:21 |
41 Matthew 4:3-4 |
Even the reference to God as the King of Jacob at this point in Isaiah fits with the fact that Jesus refuses to turn stones to bread merely because he's hungry. That's what Esau would do, not what the King of Jacob would do.
Next the tempter takes Jesus to the top of the temple and dares him to jump and rely on the angels to catch him. The dare is in the same concept space as the passage in Isaiah, which is knowing what will come in the future.
|
13 Isaiah 41:22-23 |
41 Matthew 4:5-7 |
Notice also that the tempter is questioning whether Jesus is really the son of God. In Isaiah the same issue is at stake, since only God knows the future.
The final temptation is a direct plea to worship the tempter. The supposed deal is that if Jesus would worship him he would get all the kingdoms of the world.
|
13 Isaiah 41:24 |
41 Matthew 4:8-10 |
If you treat the term "worship" as meaning "to ascribe worth" you can quickly cut through the offer the tempter has placed before Jesus. The tempter is offering worth to Jesus, the kingdoms of the world, but Jesus must worship (ascribe worth to) him. The answer is that even the tempter is to ascribe worth to (worship) God, so he cannot be the holder of worth (worship) and his offer is found to be hollow. This is what Isaiah gets to so succinctly when it says the tempter is "nothing." Not too convoluted I hope.
The next thought in Isaiah and story in Matthew share the theme of a sunrise.
|
13 Isaiah 41:25-26 |
41 Matthew 4:12-16 |
Also, the Isaiah version asks who foretold this and the Matthew version says Isaiah. I could have guessed that. The other piece that seems to be here is that Isaiah is adding a sense of what Jesus is doing or about to do in this otherwise well known story in Matthew. Jesus is fresh off an empowering time in the wilderness and he's about to start his public ministry. I think Isaiah is trying to add that he is doing so with a certain militancy. He's taking this next stage in his life very seriously. He's overcome the tempter so whose going to get in his way now?
The next thought in Isaiah is that God will give Zion one who shares good news. In Matthew Jesus begins immediately to preach the kingdom of the skies. Probably different vocabulary for more or less the same thing.
|
13 Isaiah 41:27 |
41 Matthew 4:17 |
The slight difference in vocabulary is not a concern. The fact is we've been operating in a series, and continue to do so, and we're just hitting story and after story in Matthew as we work through Isaiah 41. So what matters here is that we're in the same concept space in the two passages, regardless of what words the translators used to translate the story.
The vocabulary is also a bit hard in this match, but these do work at the concept level. First compare the two qutoes.
|
13 Isaiah 41:28-42:0 |
41 Matthew 4:18-22 |
In Isaiah God is looking for someone he can ask who can give an answer. He's having trouble finding anyone. He also says their works are nothing, empty like wind. In Matthew Jesus begins to call the disciples. They answer the call by leaving their work (or works). Instead of wind on the high seas, as fishermen, they leave their nets to follow Jesus. They answer the call. This is a good match, but the vocabulary and tone makes it a bit harder to see at first.
What Isaiah seems to add to the story is that there really weren't many folks ready for the call from Jesus. In Isaiah he's having trouble finding his man. We don't know this direclty from the primary accounts, but perhaps Jesus really had to look to find the ones he ended up with. I doubt much has changed. Are you willing to leave your occupation or career to follow Jesus should he call? What will your answer be?